Recent Articles & News:
- May 2012 Newsletter
- SCPC Visits Guangzhou Military Hospital in China
- Statistics Part 3: What are the Odds?
- Congratulations to the 50 Top Cardiovascular Hospitals
- Dr. Bahr: The Power of An Idea
- Are you attending any of these conferences? Visit with us!
- SCPC Supports the Yale Heart Study!
- Congratulations to the Accredited Hospitals in the Top 100
Discover the SCPC:
- Learn how to become accredited
- Detect the early signs of a heart attack
- Purchase your Accreditation Toolkit
- Find an accredited center near you
Learn about our Mission:
Meet our Experts
Philip D. Beckley, PhD is the Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Specialist for the Society of Chest Pain Centers. He joined the Society of Chest Pain Centers over four years ago with a clinical background in cardiopulmonary perfusion. He served as the Perfusion Education Program Director at The Ohio State University for two decades, and is currently appointed as Emeritus faculty in the College of Medicine. With his doctorate in Physiology, Dr. Beckley’s research and publications focused primarily on the effects of artificial circulation devices on the cardio-respiratory system.
What Factors Drive Pre-hospital Delay?
This article was contributed by Philip Beckley, PhD, Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Specialist, Society of Chest Pain Centers
The following are findings from the review of 13 journal articles, published between 1995 and 2010, that reported the factors that are associated with a patient's decision to delay seeking care for chest pain (either calling 911 or self-transport). Collectively, the median delay time from symptom onset to hospital arrival in these studies ranged from 1.5 to 6.0 hours with overall time ranges between 6 minutes and 48 hours.
Findings:
- Patients who had longer delay times tended to be female, older, from an ethnic minority background, and from a lower socioeconomic status and educational level.
- Patients delayed if they felt their symptoms were mild or moderate in intensity, were considered non-severe, appeared gradually or evolved over time, or varied from what they understood typical symptoms to be. Patients waited longer if they didn't feel vulnerable to their symptoms. They also waited longer if they didn't feel their symptoms were heart related. Interestingly, patients who did not sweat with their symptoms waited longer than those who did.
- Conversely, when symptoms were severe, were perceived as being serious, were accompanied with hemodynamic instability, or were immediately attributed to a cardiac event, the time delay was shorter.
- Oddly, patients who had a history of smoking, hyperlipidemia, angina, prior MI, hypertension, diabetes, and heart failure tended to wait longer than those without those experiences.
- Patients who considered their symptoms a new experience tended to have shorter delay times.
- Patients who consulted with family members or healthcare providers had longer delay times. Spouses often recommended strategies that increased delay. In some studies, consultation with a primary care physician accounted for more time delay than individual patient factors. Patients apparently feel that calling their doctor, not 911, is the right thing to do.
- Patients who consulted with co-workers or companions who were not relatives tended to have shorter delay times.
- If patients were at home, alone, resting, or asleep when symptoms first appeared they tended to wait longer.
- If symptoms appeared while engaged in physical activity, the delay was shorter.
- Delays were associated with the fear of inconveniencing or troubling others, appearing foolish or being embarrassed, abusing hospital resources, or the consequences of seeking help when it is not really needed.
- If the patient engaged in control behaviors such as taking medication, resting, trying to relax, praying, or wishing symptoms would go away, the delay was longer.
References
1. Meischke H et al. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1995;25:193-7
2. Becker L et al. Ann of Emerg Med 1996;28:612-16
3. Brown, A. L. et al. Circulation 2000;102:173–178
4. McKinley, S. et al. Heart & Lung 2000;29:237−247
5. Caldwell, M. A. and Miaskowski, C. Patient Education and Counseling 2002;46:1–9
6. Grossman, S. A. et al. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2003;21:425–428
7. Zerwic, J. J. et al. Nursing Research 2003;52:159–167
8. Kainth, A. et al. Emergency Medicine Journal 2004;21:506–508
9. Bunde, J. and Martin, R. Psychosomatic Medicine 2006;68:51−57
10. Moser DK et al. Circulation. 2006;114:168 –182
11. Fukuoka, Y. et al. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing 2007;22:132−137
12. Cytryn KN et al. Adv in Health Sci Educ 2009;14:43-59
13. Lesneski L. Applied Nursing Research 2010;23:185-190
SCPC - Because every heart matters
The Society of Chest Pain Centers promotes early symptom recognition. It is understood that heart attack symptoms may appear days or even weeks before an actual cardiac event. Through the Society’s “Early Heart Attack Care” (EHAC) initiative, both clinicians and patients alike are encouraged to recognize these early signs, in themselves and in others, and pursue treatment before an actual heart attack occurs. The EHAC initiative endeavors to provide pertinent education related to early symptom recognition and asks that everyone join in this initiative in order to save lives by committing to this cause.







